From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 26 16:35:00 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Received: from [127.0.0.1] (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C9A7106566B; Tue, 26 May 2009 16:34:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) From: Jung-uk Kim To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org, rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 12:34:33 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200905261234.42869.jkim@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Rui Paulo Subject: Re: [rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru: Patch for "device_attach: estX attach returned 6" on half of the cores] X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 16:35:00 -0000 On Tuesday 26 May 2009 05:54 am, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > Rui, good day. > > Tue, May 26, 2009 at 01:16:37AM +0100, Rui Paulo wrote: > > > If someone have ACPI tables with processor aliases -- the patch > > > can help > > > to attach est instances. I'd appreciate any testing and may be > > > some knowledgeable person can review this and help to commit > > > the patch. > > > > Regarding to the code in the patch, is this your code or > > something from a more recent ACPI-CA? > > It's mine ;)) Though I hadn't looked at the newer ACPI-CA yet. --- >8 --- SNIP!!! --- >8 --- As I posted earlier, it should be fixed in the newer ACPI-CA: http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200905041551.19904.jkim Sorry, if you missed it. Jung-uk Kim