From owner-freebsd-chat Fri May 17 6: 0:38 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from serenity.mcc.ac.uk (serenity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.93]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6241737B400 for ; Fri, 17 May 2002 06:00:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97]) by serenity.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #6) id 178hLF-000HZ0-00 for freebsd-chat@freebsd.org; Fri, 17 May 2002 14:00:17 +0100 Received: (from jcm@localhost) by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.11.6/8.11.1) id g4HD0Gj97794 for freebsd-chat@freebsd.org; Fri, 17 May 2002 14:00:16 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jcm) Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 14:00:16 +0100 From: j mckitrick To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD core team questions Message-ID: <20020517140016.A97742@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello all, I have a question or two about the current core election. A few of the remarks made by the candidates, such as 'the project is broken' sound a bit disconcerting. I am sure there are and always will be problems with getting a large number of volunteers to work in a coherent, civil manner, while keeping the technology and stability of the OS at proper priority. However, maybe I have missed a lot of news, but is the project in *that* bad of shape that we can say or even imply that it is 'broken'? Also, I don't want to pick on the candidate who made the remark, because several other comments say about the same thing. NOTE: Please CC me, as I am not currently subscribed. Thanks. jm -- My other computer is your windows box. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message