From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 22:23:16 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92CF639C for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:23:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ike@blackskyresearch.net) Received: from rs149.luxsci.com (rs149.luxsci.com [64.49.224.181]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67DE0A90 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:23:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rs149.luxsci.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rs149.luxsci.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r0OMNEb3020612; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 17:23:15 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by rs149.luxsci.com (8.14.4/8.13.8/Submit) id r0OMN2PT020414; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:23:02 GMT Received: (from sender 74627) (rs149.luxsci.com [127.0.0.1]) by LuxSci SP; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:23:01 +0000 Subject: Re: features.xml Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: "Isaac (.ike) Levy" In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 17:22:18 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable References: <70AFF504-314E-4F42-A2E1-D148D8FA2BCD@axialmarket.com> <1359058203-4509368.00016252.fr0OK9rh7016372@rs149.luxsci.com> To: Warren Block X-Lux-Comment: Message r0OMMIQq019536 sent by user #74627 Message-Id: <1359066182-9159790.08923608.fr0OMMIQq019536@rs149.luxsci.com> X-Comment: LuxSci SP Message ID - 1359066182-9159790.08923608 Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:23:16 -0000 On Jan 24, 2013, at 5:10 PM, Warren Block wrote: > On Thu, 24 Jan 2013, Isaac (.ike) Levy wrote: >> On Jan 24, 2013, at 12:09 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: >>=20 >>> On 24 January 2013 12:07, Isaac (.ike) Levy = wrote: >>>>=20 >>>> Would you like me to submit a patch back to list? (Will get to it = this weekend if so.) >>>=20 >>> Please do! >>=20 >>=20 >> What is the accepted workflow for submitting a doc patch? >=20 > Normally, it is: >=20 > get a local working copy with svn > edit > build test > check > use 'svn diff' to generate a diff > submit in a PR Thank you Warren, that's easy. I'll follow that protocol from now on. (And I'll ditch the git bits, however much muscle-memory I have invested = in it). Best, .ike