From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 27 21:27:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FFEB106578A; Wed, 27 May 2009 21:27:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wxs@atarininja.org) Received: from syn.atarininja.org (syn.csh.rit.edu [129.21.60.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C1338FC13; Wed, 27 May 2009 21:27:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wxs@atarininja.org) Received: by syn.atarininja.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3F23B5C37; Wed, 27 May 2009 17:27:27 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 17:27:27 -0400 From: Wesley Shields To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20090527212727.GA37748@atarininja.org> References: <20090517165416.GW71804@bsdcrew.de> <4f615770905262030r71075f5bmc1bc41417d878313@mail.gmail.com> <4A1D7F2D.5010803@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A1D7F2D.5010803@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Cc: perky@freebsd.org, Martin Wilke , tmclaugh@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, python@freebsd.org, clsung@frebsd.org, lwhsu@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFT] FreeBSD python25 move to python26 as default version. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 21:27:29 -0000 On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:58:05AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > Kelly Hays wrote: > > On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Martin Wilke wrote: > >> Once the installed Python has been updated to 2.6, by using one of the > >> methods above, it is required to run the upgrade-site-packages target in > >> lang/python to assure that site-packages are made available to the new Python > >> version. > >> > >> # cd /usr/ports/lang/python && make upgrade-site-packages > >> > >> This Makefile target requires ports-mgmt/portupgrade to be installed. > >> > > A lot of us are no longer using ports-mgmt/portupgrade in favor of > > ports-mgmt/portmaster. Please support both tools. > > First, I don't use python, so I'm not directly affected by this. > Second, I don't think it's reasonable to _require_ that a user needs > to use any additional tools (such as portupgrade or portmaster) to do > something with the ports system. I do think it's reasonable to provide > instructions such as, "If you use toolA, do X, for toolB do Y, and if > you don't use a tool do Z, etc." > > That said, if someone can explain what it is that needs to be done, I > will be glad to help write instructions for doing it with portmaster. At first glance it looks like pkg_which can be replaced with 'pkg_info -W' (the grep stuff may have to be changed, I haven't looked into it) and the portupgrade piece can be replaced with the equivalent in portmaster. There could be an upgrade-site-packages-portmaster target or the equivalent instructions can be added to UPDATING. # Major upgrade support PORTUPGRADE_CMD?= ${LOCALBASE}/sbin/portupgrade PKG_WHICH_CMD?= ${LOCALBASE}/sbin/pkg_which upgrade-site-packages: @if [ ! -x ${PORTUPGRADE_CMD} ]; then \ ${ECHO_MSG} "Please install ports-mgmt/portupgrade."; \ ${FALSE}; \ fi @for ver in `echo ${_PYTHON_ALLBRANCHES}|${SED} 's/${PYTHON_VER}//'`; do \ if [ -d ${PREFIX}/lib/python$$ver ]; then \ UPD=`${FIND} ${PREFIX}/lib/python$$ver \ -type f -print0 | \ ${XARGS} -0 ${PKG_WHICH_CMD} | \ ${GREP} -Fv '?' | \ ${EGREP} -v '^python2?[0-5]?-2' | \ ${SORT} -u`; \ if [ "$$UPD" ]; then \ ${PORTUPGRADE_CMD} -f $$UPD; \ fi; \ fi; \ done \ -- WXS