From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Apr  8 06:51:40 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id GAA14670
          for current-outgoing; Sat, 8 Apr 1995 06:51:40 -0700
Received: from aries.ibms.sinica.edu.tw ([140.109.40.248])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id GAA14664
          for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Sat, 8 Apr 1995 06:51:34 -0700
Received: (from taob@localhost) by aries.ibms.sinica.edu.tw (8.6.11/8.6.9) id VAA01556; Sat, 8 Apr 1995 21:51:58 +0800
Date: Sat, 8 Apr 1995 21:51:56 +0800 (CST)
From: Brian Tao <taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw>
To: FREEBSD-CURRENT-L <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: Disk performance
In-Reply-To: <m0rxXKc-0005OqC@rks32.pcs.dec.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.91.950408214953.787U-100000@aries.ibms.sinica.edu.tw>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, 8 Apr 1995, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> 
> 1st level cache: 407 MB/sec
[...]
> 1st level cache: 391 MB/sec

    Why would taking out the L2 cache slow down data transfer to and
from the primary cache?
-- 
Brian ("Though this be madness, yet there is method in't") Tao
taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw <-- work ........ play --> taob@io.org