From owner-cvs-all  Sun Mar 25  9:17:45 2001
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.208.78.105])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 44BBF37B71A; Sun, 25 Mar 2001 09:17:39 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu)
Received: (from sgk@localhost)
	by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f2PHKjN24791;
	Sun, 25 Mar 2001 09:20:45 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from sgk)
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 09:20:45 -0800
From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
To: Brian Somers <brian@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/periodic/weekly 400.status-pkg
Message-ID: <20010325092045.A24469@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
References: <200103251135.f2PBZN690547@freefall.freebsd.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <200103251135.f2PBZN690547@freefall.freebsd.org>; from brian@FreeBSD.ORG on Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 03:35:23AM -0800
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 03:35:23AM -0800, Brian Somers wrote:
> brian       2001/03/25 03:35:23 PST
> 
>   Modified files:
>     etc/periodic/weekly  400.status-pkg 
>   Log:
>   Identify obsolete ports
>   

Is this really a good idea?  I have 29 ports that are
considered obsolete on my system.  One of those 29 
is png-1.0.8.  If I blindly update png, do I then
need to update all the ports that depend on png:

root[18] pkg_info -R png-1.0.8
Information for png-1.0.8:

Required by:
gd-1.8.3
gnuplot-3.7.1
ghostscript-6.01
teTeX-1.0.7
xpaint-2.5.7
netpbm-9.7
transfig-3.2.3
xfig-3.2.3c
knews-1.0b.1
ImageMagick-5.2.3

-- 
Steve

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message