From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 29 21:03:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6EB416A4CE; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 21:03:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www.portaone.com (web.portaone.com [195.70.151.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CED3543D31; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 21:03:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sobomax@portaone.com) Received: from [192.168.0.128] ([193.28.87.111]) (authenticated bits=0) by www.portaone.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iBTL3CYj005741 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 29 Dec 2004 22:03:14 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from sobomax@portaone.com) Message-ID: <41D31B8E.7030305@portaone.com> Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 23:03:10 +0200 From: Maxim Sobolev Organization: Porta Software Ltd User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ruslan Ermilov Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-U; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.80/589/Wed Nov 17 13:38:41 2004 clamav-milter version 0.80j on www.portaone.com X-Virus-Status: Clean cc: re@FreeBSD.ORG cc: "current@freebsd.org" Subject: Building 4.x releases on 5.x and 6.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 21:03:18 -0000 Does anybody knows if subject is possible? I guess that it is not due to usage of vn(4) in the release building process, has anybody any insights about actual state of things and/or another potential problems in mind. If the only problem is vn(4) vs. md(4), I think it can be solved quite easily, while providing a good way to avoid having separate test machines for oldest branches. -Maxim