Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2024 01:06:12 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 276789] math/openblas: Update to 0.3.26 Message-ID: <bug-276789-7788-LCuRtsQqqn@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-276789-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-276789-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D276789 --- Comment #6 from Daniel Engberg <diizzy@FreeBSD.org> --- Not sure I follow you, OpenBLAS goes at great lengths to figure out things = by its own which is troublesome for packaging irregardless of framework (CMake= is actually easier to follow). It's also quite a mess and also all distros pat= ch it in some way (you can have a look using repology.org), it would be nice i= f we could avoid that or at least upstream patches. I would also argue that the current post-patch section is less than elegant but it is what it is. https://github.com/OpenMathLib/OpenBLAS/blob/develop/Makefile.system https://github.com/OpenMathLib/OpenBLAS/blob/develop/cmake/system.cmake There's no point in having multiple options as it will try to detect by its= elf and/or there's also DYNARCH which will pick whatever code path it finds most suitable for your system. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-276789-7788-LCuRtsQqqn>