Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 3 Mar 2007 11:35:43 +0100
From:      Baurzhan Ismagulov <ibr@radix50.net>
To:        aic7xxx@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Adaptec 2940UW with Fujitsu MAN3184M
Message-ID:  <20070303103542.GA31520@radix50.net>
In-Reply-To: <45E8C36C.1020407@paralan.com>
References:  <20070228204034.GA2379@radix50.net> <45E602B3.2020306@paralan.com> <20070228233314.GA7348@radix50.net> <45E77B30.2090505@paralan.com> <20070302220950.GD7331@radix50.net> <45E8C36C.1020407@paralan.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello Marc,

On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 04:38:04PM -0800, Marc D. Brooks wrote:
> I think the following are the two major questions you are asking:
> 
> 1. Why is my setup running at Fast instead of Ultra?
...
> 2. What can I do to make my system run faster?

Yes.


> I would recommend that since all of the hardware (except for the 
> controller) is LVD, capable of running at Ultra160 (which is stable) to 
> change the 2940 controller out for an Ultra160 capable LVD controller. 
> You will definitely get a faster speed than the SCSI Fast you are 
> currently experiencing, or the Ultra you ar trying to get, and not have 
> the struggles in trying to find what part(s) in your current 
> configuration are causing the system to run slower than Ultra.
> 
> I'm sorry I cannot supply a better answer which would not have the cost 
> of lots of time trying different components, or the cost of a different 
> controller, but when mixing and matching Single Ended SCSI hardware at 
> Ultra speeds, you can get a string of 1000 good setups, then hit on a 
> string of 100 problematical ones.

Ok, I'll look for a used 29160.


Thanks to all who answered!


With kind regards,
-- 
Baurzhan Ismagulov
http://www.kz-easy.com/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070303103542.GA31520>