From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Feb 14 19:17:30 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19CDB458;
 Thu, 14 Feb 2013 19:17:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org)
Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.208.146])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA34B810;
 Thu, 14 Feb 2013 19:17:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from maia.hub.org (unknown [200.46.151.188])
 by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D4E4F14B6C;
 Thu, 14 Feb 2013 15:17:28 -0400 (AST)
Received: from hub.org ([200.46.208.146])
 by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.151.188]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 58328-03; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 19:17:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.5.250.150] (remote.ilcs.sd63.bc.ca [142.31.148.2])
 by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1525BF14B6B;
 Thu, 14 Feb 2013 15:17:26 -0400 (AST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
Subject: Re: 9-STABLE -> NFS -> NetAPP:
From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
In-Reply-To: <1422247357.3019523.1360860105806.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 11:17:25 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <66254EB1-3E15-4DBF-AFA6-FFB9AC7701DB@hub.org>
References: <1422247357.3019523.1360860105806.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca>
To: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
Cc: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org,
 Kostik Belousov <kib@freebsd.org>, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 19:17:30 -0000


On 2013-02-14, at 08:41 , Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> wrote:

>=20
> Btw Marc, if you just want this problem to go away, I suspect getting =
rid
> of the "intr" mount option would do that.

Am more interested in fixing the problem (if possible) then just masking =
it, but ...

Based on the man page for mount_nfs, wouldn't that have the opposite =
effect:

             intr    Make the mount interruptible, which implies that =
file
                     system calls that are delayed due to an =
unresponsive
                     server will fail with EINTR when a termination =
signal is
                     posted for the process.

I may be mis-reading, but from the above it sounds like a -9 *should* =
terminate the process if intr is enabled, while with it disabled, it =
would ignore it =85 ?