From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Oct 16 16:30:33 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id QAA14887 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 16 Oct 1996 16:30:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id QAA14879 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 1996 16:30:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id QAA04157; Wed, 16 Oct 1996 16:26:57 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199610162326.QAA04157@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 2.2.x release question To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard) Date: Wed, 16 Oct 1996 16:26:57 -0700 (MST) Cc: jehamby@lightside.com, jsigmon@www.hsc.wvu.edu, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <29588.845495654@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Oct 16, 96 12:54:14 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > 1) More pounding on devfs (is it planned as a standard feature installed > > by sysinstall, or more of an optional feature installed by hand?) > > The latter. AFAIK, Julian still hasn't solved the persistance problem > (though we discussed a number of different ways it could be done > fairly trivially and I don't know what's holding him up) and people running > with it as their /dev still show an unfortunate tendency to crash a lot, > so no. I thought it was supposed to generate devices dynamically based on hardware presence, not persistently based on user fiat. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.