Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 15:00:36 -0800 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Andrew Reilly <andrew-freebsd@areilly.bpc-users.org> Cc: arch@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org, Garance A Drosehn <gad@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Importing csup into base Message-ID: <20060301230036.GA65289@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <20060301224120.GA33946@gurney.reilly.home> References: <20060301170306.GZ55746@elvis.mu.org> <p06230908c02ba3dee4c9@[128.113.24.47]> <20060301224120.GA33946@gurney.reilly.home>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 09:41:20AM +1100, Andrew Reilly wrote: > On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 03:18:07PM -0500, Garance A Drosehn wrote: > > Even > > though I do like to work with multiple computer languages (and > > in fact there is a lot I like about Modula-3), I do think a tool > > such as cvsup needs to be in a more universally-available and > > widely-known language. > > I like Modula-3 too (at least conceptually: I haven't found an > excuse to code in it), but not "widely-known" is perhaps even an > understatement. I came across this site the other day: > http://www.tiobe.com/index.htm?tiobe_index > Which I thought pretty interesting. I noticed that Modula-3 > doesn't even make it into the top-100 popular languages, which > puts it below Algol, Oberon, and Modula-2. > Interesting site. Guess which language in the top 20 has the most recently approved International standard? -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060301230036.GA65289>