From owner-freebsd-security Fri May 21 16:19:46 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from host07.rwsystems.net (kasie.rwsystems.net [209.197.192.103]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECF561564C for ; Fri, 21 May 1999 16:19:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jwyatt@RWSystems.net) Received: from kasie.rwsystems.net([209.197.192.103]) (1172 bytes) by host07.rwsystems.net via sendmail with P:esmtp/R:bind_hosts/T:inet_zone_bind_smtp (sender: ) id for ; Fri, 21 May 1999 18:04:40 -0500 (CDT) (Smail-3.2.0.104 1998-Nov-20 #1 built 1998-Dec-24) Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 18:04:40 -0500 (CDT) From: James Wyatt To: "Ilmar S. Habibulin" Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav , posix1e@cyrus.watson.org, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: secure deletion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, 21 May 1999, Ilmar S. Habibulin wrote: > On 21 May 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > > > My thoughts are about an option in kernel config file (WIPEINFO?) > > A mount option would be better. > Why mount option? Secure deletion is a feature of fs and impacts files of > this on this fs. All of them. So why use mount option? I took him to mean that you could have a mount optionto disallow it on a particular filesystem. (like nosuid, etc..) - Jy@ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message