From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 23 19:44:35 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59D9516A4B3; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 19:44:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-169-107-253.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.169.107.253]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A36143FE3; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 19:44:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE67F66CFA; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 19:44:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B127FA87; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 19:44:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 19:44:33 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: John Birrell Message-ID: <20030924024433.GA55759@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20030924021820.GA55388@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030924023205.GK34649@freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au> <20030924023343.GA55583@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030924024354.GA44314@freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030924024354.GA44314@freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: deischen@freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Initial list of ports that fail due to -pthread X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 02:44:35 -0000 --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 12:43:54PM +1000, John Birrell wrote: > On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 07:33:43PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > Won't these ports still need to be fixed to look at > > PTHREAD_{LIBS,CFLAGS} though, since the correct values for 4.x and 5.x > > will still be different? >=20 > Not if -pthread remains. Internally gcc would link to a different > library, but most ports won't see that. OK, I'll put this on hold until you guys sort it out :) Kris --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/cQURWry0BWjoQKURAiDFAKCEU0tc4I50HXvMcAcYJR0ME0w6SgCbB6Bz wTnj6kTlTvFP862jGmEig3o= =igZO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5--