Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 14:02:32 +0100 From: Thomas Steen Rasmussen <thomas@gibfest.dk> To: Sofian Brabez <sbz@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: [patch] TLS Server Name Indication (SNI) support for fetch(1) Message-ID: <52BECBE8.8080906@gibfest.dk> In-Reply-To: <20130608205653.GA8765@ogoshi.int.nbs-system.com> References: <20130608205653.GA8765@ogoshi.int.nbs-system.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08-06-2013 22:56, Sofian Brabez wrote: > Hi, > > fetch(1) currently does not support TLS extension Server Name Indication (RFC > 6066) [1] when dealing with SSL. Nowadays lot of clients and servers implement > this extension. Hello! fetch(1) is still missing SNI support as of r259440 - any chance of seeing this patch committed ? As ipv4 depletion gets worse we will see SSL websites using SNI more and more. This is overdue. Thanks, and may you all have a wonderful new year! /Thomas Steen Rasmussen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52BECBE8.8080906>