From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 29 15:51:07 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CD83634 for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:51:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C92A8358 for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:51:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id r0TForul089197; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 02:50:53 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 02:50:53 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Kevin Oberman Subject: Re: what is required to support a new laptop? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20130130024649.R87033@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20130128114938.GK50515@e-new.0x20.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:51:07 -0000 On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 22:24:29 -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Eitan Adler wrote: > > On 28 January 2013 06:49, Lars Engels wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 08:55:40AM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> I recently purchased a Lenovo Y530 and attempted to use some of the > >>> ACPI features (brightness of backlight, etc.) > >>> > >>> I attempted to load acpi_ibm but devd reported no events (running with > >>> devd -dD). What information might be useful to help support this > >>> laptop? > >> > >> Did you set dev.acpi_ibm.0.events=1? > > > > I don't see this as an option at all. > > Setting dev.acpi_ibm.0.events=1 still does not cause the brightness > functions to generate events. Could the initialmask and or availmask > tie into this in some way? Have we seen 'sysctl dev.acpi_ibm' from this machine yet? Maybe clues? Ideally after kldload acpi_ibm and before any sysctl changes .. cheers, Ian