From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Jun 8 5:17:38 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from assaris.sics.se (assaris.sics.se [193.10.66.234]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 686A837B403 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 05:17:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from assar@assaris.sics.se) Received: (from assar@localhost) by assaris.sics.se (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA63008; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 14:17:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from assar) To: Garance A Drosihn Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 'make clean' vs automake vs /bin/sh, which to fix? References: From: Assar Westerlund Date: 08 Jun 2001 14:17:37 +0200 In-Reply-To: Garance A Drosihn's message of "Mon, 28 May 2001 06:00:38 -0400" Message-ID: <5lofrztbby.fsf@assaris.sics.se> Lines: 14 User-Agent: Gnus/5.070098 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.98) Emacs/20.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Garance A Drosihn writes: > So, we could fix this by: > 1) changing /bin/sh This you have already done and I think it's ok. > 2) changing make not to call /bin/sh with -e > 3) changing 'automake' to include a "true;" statement > in that 'for' loop (or some other trick) when > spitting out the target for things like clean-recursive I believe this has also been fixed in more modern automake. /assar To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message