From owner-freebsd-current Sun Oct 25 09:54:32 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA00263 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sun, 25 Oct 1998 09:54:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail1.its.rpi.edu (mail1.its.rpi.edu [128.113.100.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA00258 for ; Sun, 25 Oct 1998 09:54:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.acs.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by mail1.its.rpi.edu (8.8.8/8.8.6) with ESMTP id MAA94118; Sun, 25 Oct 1998 12:54:31 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Sender: drosih@pop1.rpi.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <19981024083632.N28824@freebie.lemis.com> <199810232221.PAA08852@usr07.primenet.com>; from Terry Lambert on Fri, Oct 23, 1998 at 10:21:23PM +0000 <199810232221.PAA08852@usr07.primenet.com> Date: Sun, 25 Oct 1998 13:58:39 -0400 To: Bob Bishop From: Garance A Drosihn Subject: Re: Interesting 3.0 bug Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 5:03 PM +0000 10/24/98, Bob Bishop wrote: > Hi, > > FWIW I get the same result as Terry both on 2.2.5R and 3.0-CURRENT. > > I wonder if it's a TERM thang? vt100 here It is not a TERM thing. It is old enough that the problem is even mentioned in the man page for 'more'. There have been a half-dozen send-pr reports about this, one of which included a patch to fix the bug. (perhaps not the best fix imaginable, but a fix nonetheless). See problem report bin/7296, for instance. Last I knew someone was testing this bug fix along the way to including it in the official distribution. --- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@eclipse.its.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or drosih@rpi.edu Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message