Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 20:03:34 +0100 From: Thierry Thomas <thierry@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Some fun with -O2 Message-ID: <YACVhjvg/74gBJB1@graf.pompo.net> In-Reply-To: <CAPyFy2CY_tMo=%2BeX5E0_Yp=c=1Ei0v6e5p1uvVaLH7%2BXTisoBw@mail.gmail.com> References: <YAAqI08bgBtfpssP@graf.pompo.net> <YAAuouAngRyT7Dw0@kib.kiev.ua> <YAA2a4hBEc4xWJ3Z@graf.pompo.net> <CAPyFy2CY_tMo=%2BeX5E0_Yp=c=1Ei0v6e5p1uvVaLH7%2BXTisoBw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le jeu. 14 janv. 21 à 15:22:30 +0100, Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> écrivait : > > Indeed, but the fun part is the different behaviour with / without -O2. > > Perhaps fun, but not surprising; this is a consequence of some optimization. > > Can we fix this in autoconf and then have math/oleo regenerate configure? Configure is written to analyze a lot of systems, but since we know our mktime, I just wanted to shunt this part of the script. -- Th. Thomas.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?YACVhjvg/74gBJB1>