From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Nov 21 4:40:24 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from lucifer.ninth-circle.org (lucifer.bart.nl [194.158.168.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA04E37B479 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 04:40:20 -0800 (PST) Received: (from asmodai@localhost) by lucifer.ninth-circle.org (8.11.1/8.11.0) id eALCdq124210; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 13:39:52 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from asmodai) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 13:39:52 +0100 From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sukwoo_Seo__=28_=BC=AD=BC=AE=BF=EC_=29?= Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: your mail Message-ID: <20001121133951.H12420@lucifer.bart.nl> References: <000a01c05402$1282be80$886cced2@skponpiiiw2k> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <000a01c05402$1282be80$886cced2@skponpiiiw2k>; from seo@dpisys.com on Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 01:29:04PM -0800 Organisation: VIA Net.Works The Netherlands Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -On [20001121 05:30], Sukwoo Seo \( ¼­¼®¿ì \) (seo@dpisys.com) wrote: >Hi im developing a system that will involve clustering, ipc, and rpc's >from an NT box. Some of the servers will be dealling with tcp while >others udp. All servers will need to be able to handle a high capicty. >Can you provide any insight on which version of free bsd would be the >most stable to use for my case? Go with 4.x-STABLE. 4.2-RELEASE should hit the ftp sites in a few. -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven VIA Net.Works The Netherlands BSD: Technical excellence at its best Network- and systemadministrator D78D D0AD 244D 1D12 C9CA 7152 035C 1138 546A B867 One from many... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message