From owner-freebsd-current Sat Apr 3 14:21:12 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from relay.nuxi.com (nuxi.ucdavis.edu [169.237.7.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48D411517A for ; Sat, 3 Apr 1999 14:20:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by relay.nuxi.com (8.9.2/8.9.1) id OAA73359; Sat, 3 Apr 1999 14:18:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Message-ID: <19990403141824.B73304@nuxi.com> Date: Sat, 3 Apr 1999 14:18:24 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Steve Price Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: X problems using egcs as compiler Reply-To: obrien@NUXI.com References: <19990403115632.B72956@nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i In-Reply-To: ; from Steve Price on Sat, Apr 03, 1999 at 03:16:30PM -0600 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.1-STABLE Organization: The NUXI BSD group X-PGP-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Keyid: 34F9F9D5 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I got everything setup to build the entire ports collection and > sometime during the night the big IDE disk that I keep all the I'm not sure the best way to approach this. The specification file used in the port is different from the one that will be in the base system. (the on in the Port is more stock EGCS) The base system will have many more of our hacks. So the fix we mentioned might not be needed with the base EGCS. Maybe you can just compile all the ports just to see where we stand. I don't expect *any* problems with ports that use the C compiler. All the problems I think we might have are C++ compiler issues. -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.com -or- obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message