From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jan  3 23:50:56 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A842616A4D3; Mon,  3 Jan 2005 23:50:56 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6330D43D60; Mon,  3 Jan 2005 23:50:56 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (rwatson@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j03Nou54000948;
	Mon, 3 Jan 2005 23:50:56 GMT
	(envelope-from rwatson@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from rwatson@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j03Noubm000944;
	Mon, 3 Jan 2005 23:50:56 GMT
	(envelope-from rwatson)
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 23:50:56 GMT
From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
Message-Id: <200501032350.j03Noubm000944@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: rwatson@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org, peter@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: kern/70880: [nfs] 5.3 beta1 nfs problem
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 23:50:57 -0000

Synopsis: [nfs] 5.3 beta1 nfs problem

Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->peter
Responsible-Changed-By: rwatson
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Jan 3 23:47:31 GMT 2005
Responsible-Changed-Why: 
Chown PR to Peter, since he put together our current nfsiod infrastructure.
Given that we launch new nfsiod threads on demand when they are needed, is
there any reason not to default to 0 as the minimum, and bump that up when
the first NFS mount appears?


http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=70880