From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 22 14:27:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDD4A16A421; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 14:27:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dodell@offmyserver.com) Received: from raqdevil.offmyserver.com (ext-unused-110.ixsystems.net [206.40.55.110]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3488943D5E; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 14:27:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dodell@offmyserver.com) Received: from raqdevil.offmyserver.com (dho@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by raqdevil.offmyserver.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j7MER13w035762; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 07:27:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dodell@offmyserver.com) Received: (from dho@localhost) by raqdevil.offmyserver.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j7MER1X0035761; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 07:27:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dodell@offmyserver.com) X-Authentication-Warning: raqdevil.offmyserver.com: dho set sender to dodell@offmyserver.com using -f Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 07:27:01 -0700 From: "Devon H. O'Dell" To: Andre Oppermann Message-ID: <20050822142701.GD27233@raqdevil.offmyserver.com> References: <20050822100059.GA24626@FreeBSD.org> <863bp25c7t.fsf@xps.des.no> <4309D5D7.C7C76B5B@freebsd.org> <86d5o63wuw.fsf@xps.des.no> <4309DF15.FD4D6C56@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4309DF15.FD4D6C56@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav , Alexey Dokuchaev , arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fdesc allocation optimization X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 14:27:58 -0000 On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 04:20:05PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote: > Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > > > > Andre Oppermann writes: > > > When did you commit this? Is it only in post 5.0 releases? > > > > Early 2004, before RELENG_5 was branched. > > That explains why DFBSD didn't have it. So we are better off in > anything >5.x despite the uninformed comments on the DFBSD lists. > > -- > Andre I think that they actually did a good bit of research into all of the fdalloc implementations in the BSDs before choosing their path. Perhaps misunderstood is a more accurate word than uninformed. --Devon