Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 16:26:08 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: gecko@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough Message-ID: <bug-239682-21738-dhAk0k0YY6@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-239682-21738@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-239682-21738@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239682 --- Comment #28 from Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Jan Beich from comment #23) I did prepare over the whole 9.0.0 cycle, I find your implications that I d= id not offensive. You are correct that some bugs won't be found until LLVM_DEFAULT is bumped,= but doing it without coordination with me (the PR does not count) and making the switch the I was unavailable to respond to the reports is unacceptable. I'm upset that users are getting a less than ideal experience due to your needl= ess rush to bump the default and worse that we've inflicted it on the quarterly branch effectively untested. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-239682-21738-dhAk0k0YY6>