From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Feb 17 5:32: 7 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6463910FC3 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 1999 05:32:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA13074; Wed, 17 Feb 1999 14:31:35 +0100 (CET) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id OAA70226; Wed, 17 Feb 1999 14:31:31 +0100 (MET) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 14:31:31 +0100 From: Eivind Eklund To: Wes Peters Cc: John Polstra , Jamie Bowden , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD mention in LWN interview with A.C. Message-ID: <19990217143130.G69668@bitbox.follo.net> References: <36C9F60F.7AE40274@softweyr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.1i In-Reply-To: <36C9F60F.7AE40274@softweyr.com>; from Wes Peters on Tue, Feb 16, 1999 at 03:49:51PM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Feb 16, 1999 at 03:49:51PM -0700, Wes Peters wrote: > As I said, Perforce is an excellent product with much to recommend it, > but probably not the best solution for FreeBSD. What we have works quite > well, because it was developed by highly motivated developers to pretty > much do exactly what FreeBSD needs. If only *every* development project > were this lucky. > > Especially Linux... ;^) http://www.bitkeeper.com/ Looks quite good. It is missing a number of features from my favourite (but not yet implemented) design, but it also has a number of nice aspects that I've missed... Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message