From owner-freebsd-alpha Wed Oct 18 8:44:37 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from femail4.sdc1.sfba.home.com (femail4.sdc1.sfba.home.com [24.0.95.84]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0501D37B4C5 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 08:44:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from home.net ([24.0.178.21]) by femail4.sdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with ESMTP id <20001018154321.KXPY23659.femail4.sdc1.sfba.home.com@home.net>; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 08:43:21 -0700 Message-ID: <39EDC5BF.B1567D51@home.net> Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 08:46:07 -0700 From: Craig Burgess X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en,ru MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kirby Cc: freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Alpha 4.x releases (production quality?) References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org #uname -a #FreeBSD Felix 4.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.1-RELEASE #4: Wed Aug 23 23:17:04 PDT 2000 #EB164 #Digital AlphaPC 164 FWIW, my experience -- with this machine -- is completely positive. craig Kris Kirby wrote: > > Would a general concensus of the folks on -alpha agree that FreeBSD 4.x > for the Alpha is stable enough for a production server? > > ----- > Kris Kirby, KE4AHR | TGIFreeBSD... 'Nuff said. > | > ------------------------------------------------------- > "Fate, it seems, is not without a sense of irony." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message