Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 08:46:07 -0700 From: Craig Burgess <craig-burgess@home.net> To: Kris Kirby <kris@catonic.net> Cc: freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Alpha 4.x releases (production quality?) Message-ID: <39EDC5BF.B1567D51@home.net> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010180235330.20601-100000@spaz.huntsvilleal.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
#uname -a #FreeBSD Felix 4.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.1-RELEASE #4: Wed Aug 23 23:17:04 PDT 2000 #EB164 #Digital AlphaPC 164 FWIW, my experience -- with this machine -- is completely positive. craig Kris Kirby wrote: > > Would a general concensus of the folks on -alpha agree that FreeBSD 4.x > for the Alpha is stable enough for a production server? > > ----- > Kris Kirby, KE4AHR | TGIFreeBSD... 'Nuff said. > <kris@nospam.catonic.net> | > ------------------------------------------------------- > "Fate, it seems, is not without a sense of irony." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?39EDC5BF.B1567D51>