Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 21:42:53 +0100 From: Michal Varga <varga.michal@gmail.com> To: Bahman Kahinpour <bahman.linux@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Debian GNU/kFreeBSD Message-ID: <1297543373.1491.16.camel@xenon> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimZR3fP_vyR-68gB4xwtK5CccG1ryrgk4DZRRNv@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTimZR3fP_vyR-68gB4xwtK5CccG1ryrgk4DZRRNv@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 23:33 +0330, Bahman Kahinpour wrote: > Does anyone think that having an optional APT system somewhere like in > the Ports Collection or ... You already know where the "..." is, it's called "Debian GNU/kFreeBSD". I have been told that both its users are perfectly happy with apt-system and everything else that accompanies it and then for the rest, there's this other thing called "FreeBSD". Or are you offering yourself to develop a completely new, standalone and parallel ports-like/package infrastructure for FreeBSD and maintain it? If so, then seriously, good luck with that. > ... can be advantageous? No. m. -- Michal Varga, Stonehenge (Gmail account)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1297543373.1491.16.camel>