From owner-freebsd-ipfw Tue Jul 23 11:54: 7 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BFB937B400 for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2002 11:54:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web13102.mail.yahoo.com (web13102.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.174.147]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3909843E4A for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2002 11:54:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from netmetrica@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20020723185403.24782.qmail@web13102.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [208.131.80.226] by web13102.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 23 Jul 2002 11:54:03 PDT Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 11:54:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Netmetrica corp Subject: IPFW Problem with Aliases on single Interface To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm running BSD4.5 with one ethernet interface. that interface has multiple IP aliases. I would like to give each IP address a seperate ingress and egress rule. or in other words I want different subnets to be treated separately if those subnets are aliases on the same physical interface. However, the IPFW takes a shortcut and it seems to just use the the single outgoing interface instead of the multiple IP address that are assigned to that interface. Is there a reason that this feature is not supported other than speed? If my question is not clear please tell me to explain it further. With regards, ~N __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better http://health.yahoo.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message