From owner-freebsd-chat Fri Mar 29 21: 1: 2 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from sleepy.wojomedia.com (sleepy.wojomedia.com [216.107.102.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4425B37B41B for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2002 21:01:00 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 17620 invoked by uid 1000); 30 Mar 2002 05:01:00 -0000 Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 23:01:00 -0600 From: Tim To: Benjamin Krueger Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: qmail (Was: Maintaining Access Control Lists ) Message-ID: <20020330050100.GA17537@sleepy.wojomedia.com> References: <3C9C84CF.2090300@flash.net> <20020323084327.A354@rain.macguire.net> <3C9DF87D.5050306@cream.org> <20020326142957.A3519@math.uic.edu> <20020328020224.GA11419@sleepy.wojomedia.com> <20020330045306.GA17371@sleepy.wojomedia.com> <20020329205439.E7895@rain.macguire.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020329205439.E7895@rain.macguire.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Which he previously mentioned was pre-fabricated. This is getting a bit silly, > methinks. First, this is -chat. We are allowed to be silly, I believe. Second, he also said he welcomes factual corrections but then waives his hand over all of Dan's response. Third, so what if it was pre-fabricated? Tim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message