From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Feb 21 23:10:49 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 096A8106566C
	for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 23:10:49 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bf1783@googlemail.com)
Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com
	[209.85.213.54])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC8538FC1E
	for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 23:10:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ywf9 with SMTP id 9so411321ywf.13
	for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:10:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject
	:from:to:content-type;
	bh=mF6O4D5p4kjZ5h56gJ0exUPM7kHKyFvEfyjes/ekN2Q=;
	b=BA2zUhPOUk3sC81niND8fJEo4Z4tYuHwKuCFGRKIhmUm3Yg0jhqpfwaVQTTQzgPRv7
	GX7ulRKbbVgQrLuT14QpMXhSlRR3uJkU1qspXL3VgMG6Fb6eYxSDcbzXgfYLo7i/RiOt
	d+1Jw1v7dBUetvxB8g/u7pET6JD+iRZFlvRiQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
	b=GzwFgQ8T2sq46eTY+b9MBMQVkWDqCCiiYAmS8UPaxZ1nMtULA67i3/tUNZLp+odBN4
	+FGbexisEyTe/2gyAGQnituEWhvsKgslUkvy08FA+d8VWbOIy4MXd2eZQLAStfPiKGoO
	H4P9eRNhZrbaqhpElx7NluhdjvGWSDcL6+xBk=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.109.166 with SMTP id s26mr3568780yhg.76.1298328463723;
	Mon, 21 Feb 2011 14:47:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.236.110.52 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 14:47:43 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 17:47:43 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=xLRuiEm_zZNOtnFFUX0_UoqRGq2Fb6ZLS2h+p@mail.gmail.com>
From: "b. f." <bf1783@googlemail.com>
To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>, 
	Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: 
Subject: Re: FreeBSD ABI?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: bf1783@gmail.com
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 23:10:49 -0000

> > Where is it documented?
> > Are there differences with the linux ABI?
> >
> > Particularly I am interested in stack alignment requirement. For example
> > i386 Solaris, Linux and MacOS have 16 bit stack alignment for procedure
> > calls. This is reflected in LLVM sources:
> >
> >   if (isTargetDarwin() || isTargetLinux() || isTargetSolaris() || Is64Bit)
> >     stackAlignment = 16;
> >
> >
> > But FreeBSD is excluded there. Is this a bug in LLVM which magically
> > doesn't cause crashes or this is correct and FreeBSD doesn't have 16 bit
> > alignment?
>
> the alignment is specified in bytes but yes, I wonder too, what is the
> stack alignment on freebsd on amd64/i386?
>
>

Isn't it supposed to [1] conform to:

http://www.sco.com/developers/devspecs/abi386-4.pdf
http://www.x86-64.org/documentation/abi.pdf

?

[1] See, for example:

http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2011-January/034045.html
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/lib/csu/i386-elf/crt1_s.S
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-head/2010-December/023065.html