From owner-freebsd-chat  Tue Dec  3 09:43:56 1996
Return-Path: owner-chat
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA01608
          for chat-outgoing; Tue, 3 Dec 1996 09:43:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hmsa01 ([205.172.19.178])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id JAA01603
          for <chat@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 3 Dec 1996 09:43:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from TERRA ([10.1.73.41]) by hmsa01 (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
	id AA02411; Tue, 3 Dec 1996 07:42:03 -1000
Message-Id: <32A44724.52E9@hmsa.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 1996 07:28:36 -0800
From: Terrance <tyoung@hmsa.com>
Organization: Sorted by piles... on my desk :-)
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (WinNT; I)
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: chat@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: TCP/IP bandwidth bragging
References: <199612030250.UAA25677@brasil.moneng.mei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-chat@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Humm... That's a good one... How about this...
I have a machine sitting on the side with FreeBSD doing nothing :-) the
Power supply is Dead (it's supposed to be running the switch is on) I
bet that would be REAL Slow huh? Heh, Heh, Heh...

Joe Greco wrote:
> 
> > David Greenman <dg@root.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > [corbin:bsd] lat_tcp localhost
> > > $Id: lat_tcp.c,v 1.1 1994/11/18 08:49:48 lm Exp $
> >
> > Oh boy! I want to try this too! Where do I find lat_tcp and similar goodies?
> >
> > While I can't compete for the fastest, I'll try for the slowest. I have a
> > 386SX16 with 4.5M (don't know where the half is, but FreeBSD says its
> > there) and a 3-com 8 bit Etherlink II. That machine takes 4 days to do
> > "catman -f". So beat that if you dare!
> 
> What are you bellyaching about!!  I have.. a..
> 
> 386SX/16 with 3MB RAM (2 1x9's plus 4 256kX4's)
> 
> WD 40MB hard disk (one of the earliest IDE drives)
> 
> It has a blazing fast SMC 8003E...
> 
> AND it doesn't work if in turbo mode.  (So figure it's a 386SX/8)
> 
> Any takers?  I can (barely) think of worse configurations.  Surely
> somebody has one!
> 
> :-)  :-)  Followups to -chat.
> 
> ... JG