From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 11 13:40:38 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 944D38A0 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 13:40:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55D871AB1 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 13:40:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 4EDBC33C49; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 09:40:34 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Brad Fleming Subject: Re: Potential Doc Mistake References: <44wqex5czr.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 09:40:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Brad Fleming's message of "Thu, 10 Apr 2014 12:55:26 -0500") Message-ID: <44ha60t25q.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: cperiva@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 13:40:38 -0000 Brad Fleming writes: > On Apr 10, 2014, at 12:08 PM, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > >> Brad Fleming writes: >>=20 >>> I think this document might have syntax error: >>> https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/updating-upgrading-freebsdupdate.h= tml >>>=20 >>> Under "23.2.3.2. Performing the Upgrade=94 the first command listed is: >>> "freebsd-update -r 9.1-RELEASE upgrade=94 >>> but I believe the proper command should be: >>> "freebsd-update upgrade -r 9.1-RELEASE=94 >>> (the =93upgrade=94 is in the wrong place) >>>=20 >>> I could certainly be wrong but the second command is what=92s referenced >>> in other documents and was required for me to move from 9.2 to 10.0. >>=20 >> The manual page actually lists options before the subcommand. A quick >> look at the source makes me think that either order is fine. > The command as listed fails on my 9.2-RELEASE VM. But perhaps that=92s > different in other versions. In either case I=92m not a Free BSD master > and could certainly be wrong. Unfortunately, I didn't have time to really look at this closely, so it's probably me that's wrong. I'll leave a note to myself to dive in if I get a chance, but it would be better if someone else gave it a look.