From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 4 00:14:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C047C16A4CE; Sun, 4 Jul 2004 00:14:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8837B43D55; Sun, 4 Jul 2004 00:14:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id EF675148BE; Sat, 3 Jul 2004 19:14:31 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2004 19:14:31 -0500 (CDT) From: Mark Linimon X-X-Sender: linimon@pancho To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20040703231027.GA74329@xor.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 04 Jul 2004 11:47:09 +0000 cc: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ACPI-CA 20040527 import X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2004 00:14:32 -0000 On Sat, 3 Jul 2004, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Then either make -O2 mandatory for developers by putting it in > make.conf, or don't complain that developers aren't building with your > private special settings. Um, am I missing something, or would not putting -O2 in /etc/make.conf also suddenly start making ports with -O2 also? Has anyone ever tried this? mcl