From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Jun 21 15:11:40 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id PAA07780 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 21 Jun 1996 15:11:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA07770 for ; Fri, 21 Jun 1996 15:11:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jraynard.demon.co.uk (am081.du.pipex.com [193.130.252.81]) by who.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.11) with ESMTP id PAA22914 for ; Fri, 21 Jun 1996 15:11:33 -0700 Received: (from fhackers@localhost) by jraynard.demon.co.uk (8.7.5/8.6.12) id LAA00655; Fri, 21 Jun 1996 11:38:18 GMT Date: Fri, 21 Jun 1996 11:38:18 GMT Message-Id: <199606211138.LAA00655@jraynard.demon.co.uk> From: James Raynard To: michaelv@HeadCandy.com CC: wosch@cs.tu-berlin.de, leisner@sdsp.mc.xerox.com, hackers@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <199606210720.AAA01256@MindBender.HeadCandy.com> (michaelv@HeadCandy.com) Subject: Re: top 3.4beta2 on freebsd 2.2 (5/1/96 snapshot) Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > >> >I kinda got top 3.4beta2 working on freebsd 5.1.96 (2.2 snapshot). > > >> Top from ports tree (FreeBSD-current/ports/sysutils/top) works for 2.1 > >> and -current. > > >But that's version 3.3, though. > > >Are there any advantages to version 3.4? If so, would we be better > >advised to wait until it comes out of beta? > > I'm still happily running 3.2. What am I missing? :-) Support for twin-processor Sparcs? 8-) -- James Raynard, Edinburgh, Scotland james@jraynard.demon.co.uk