From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Feb 27 22:52:03 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id WAA16225
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 27 Feb 1996 22:52:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id WAA16193
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 27 Feb 1996 22:51:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.v-site.net [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id WAA00377; Tue, 27 Feb 1996 22:48:16 -0800
Message-Id: <199602280648.WAA00377@rah.star-gate.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.5 12/11/95
To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@ki.net>
cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Pentium gcc (pgcc) in ports... 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 27 Feb 1996 23:40:17 EST."
             <Pine.BSF.3.91.960227233710.18679C-100000@ki.net> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 1996 22:48:16 -0800
From: "Amancio Hasty Jr." <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Well, the general consesus is that someone drop the ball and in some
programs like mpeg_play we lost oh about 30% performace from 
a previous pgcc version.

	Amancio

>>> "Marc G. Fournier" said:
 > 
 > Hiya...
 > 
 > 	I'm just grabbing down pl6 of pgcc, and was wondering what the
 > general concensous(sp?) is on it.  I know that it is generally accepted
 > that 2.7.2 is too buggy to be used for stuff like compiling XFree and
 > the kernel and whatnot...does anyone have any similar or opposite comments
 > about pgcc?
 > 
 > Thanks...
 > 
 > Marc G. Fournier | POP Mail  Telnet Acct  DNS Hosting
 > System           |  WWW Services   Database Services  | Knowledge, 
 >   Administrator  |                                    | Information and
 >  scrappy@ki.net  |      WWW: http://www.ki.net        | Communications, Inc
 > 
 >