From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Sep 17 14:14:16 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6225E1065675
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 17 Sep 2011 14:14:16 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from fahad@dumbain.net)
Received: from vms173009pub.verizon.net (vms173009pub.verizon.net
	[206.46.173.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43DF48FC12
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 17 Sep 2011 14:14:16 +0000 (UTC)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT
Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Received: from [192.168.1.13] ([unknown] [173.60.57.149])
	by vms173009.mailsrvcs.net
	(Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16
	2009)) with ESMTPA id <0LRO00FEA4RAHQA0@vms173009.mailsrvcs.net> for
	freebsd-security@freebsd.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2011 08:14:05 -0500 (CDT)
Message-id: <4E749D14.4050201@dumbain.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 06:13:56 -0700
From: Fahad Ahmad <fahad@dumbain.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0.1) Gecko/20110902
	Thunderbird/6.0.1
To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
References: <86boukbk8s.fsf@ds4.des.no> <4E73C163.9040601@llnl.gov>
	<4E7492FE.2090506@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
In-reply-to: <4E7492FE.2090506@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 16:27:50 +0000
Subject: Re: PAM modules -> LDAP!
X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]"
	<freebsd-security.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 14:14:16 -0000

Not everybody requires LDAP/PAM , so making it part of base is not a 
valid reason.
Same can apply for any other 3rd party port (Apache,Samba,etc etc).



On 09/17/2011 05:30 AM, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> On 09/16/11 23:36, Mike Carlson wrote:
>> On 09/16/2011 08:05 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
>>> We currently have a number of PAM modules in ports, and while some of
>>> them are specific to certain third-party software, many aren't.  I
>>> believe we would benefit from importing at least some of these into
>>> base.  My question is: which ones?
>>>
>>> DES
>> LDAP support out of the box would be fantastic.
>>
>> Mike C
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
>> "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
> Also a strong vote for LDAP support. LDAP is our backend for several
> server systems and it is a kind of pain
> having to think first for the ports to be installed. Also I suspect and
> hope a better integration if LDAP gets
> part of the core system.
>
> Regards,
> Oliver
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"