From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Mar 19 19:37:03 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id TAA26245 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 19 Mar 1996 19:37:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id TAA26227 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 1996 19:36:41 -0800 (PST) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id UAA25880; Tue, 19 Mar 1996 20:31:36 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199603200331.UAA25880@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: GAS question To: kaleb@x.org (Kaleb S. KEITHLEY) Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1996 20:31:35 -0700 (MST) Cc: hackers@freefall.freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199603200027.AAA02973@exalt.x.org> from "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" at Mar 19, 96 07:27:26 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > What does this pissing contest have to do with -hackers or FreeBSD??? Viability as a commercial OS to tempt weenies who need IDE's to be able to program at all. > > I just went and looked at my SDK and DDK CDROMs... and there is no > > compiler on the things. > > Which SDK? I know for a fact that the (now two and a half year old) > Windows NT 3.1 Win32 SDK had the C compiler on it. There is the problem. I am talking Windows95 (which is, itself, more of a commercial succes than NT as well). > They were in the copy of VC++ 2.0 we bought last year; I have a tough > time believing it's not in the SDK or VC++ 4.0. It's in VC++ 4.0, of course. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.