From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Nov 17 16:06:34 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id QAA23594
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 17 Nov 1996 16:06:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA23578
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 17 Nov 1996 16:06:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from current1.whistle.com (current1.whistle.com [207.76.205.22]) by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) with SMTP id PAA02027; Sun, 17 Nov 1996 15:52:39 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <328FA543.167EB0E7@whistle.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 1996 15:52:35 -0800
From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>
Organization: Whistle Communications
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2-CURRENT i386)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dg@Root.COM
CC: Erich Boleyn <erich@uruk.org>, Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>,
        hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Memory probe(s) in FreeBSD
References: <199611172327.PAA19129@root.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

David Greenman wrote:

>    This is fine with me; I just object to dropping support for older
> bootblocks. I don't object to dropping support for really-old (pre-2.0.5)
> bootblocks, however.

especially when it's so easy to install new ones..

(disklabel -B wd0)