From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Tue May 30 13:09:17 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ECADB7C8BF for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 13:09:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D0D0341 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 13:09:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v4UD9FcO042131 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 13:09:17 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 217515] [exp-run] Update PostgreSQL default version to 9.5 Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 13:09:16 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Ports Framework X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: tz@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: portmgr@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: exp-run? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 13:09:17 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D217515 --- Comment #30 from Torsten Zuehlsdorff --- (In reply to Palle Girgensohn from comment #29) > How do we go about so we don't all fix the same problems? Shall we just=20 > write something here, or should we have a separate PR per port? As i noticed within this PR i already fixed every finding ;) As from my viewpoint there is nothing to do left. Maybe another exp-run, because i like it to be safe.=20 Also it would be nice if somebody other also will check my upgrade procedure from comment 24. Because better safe than sorry. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=