From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Jun 6 10:54:33 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A90EEBFD215 for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 10:54:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@omnilan.de) Received: from mx0.gentlemail.de (mx0.gentlemail.de [IPv6:2a00:e10:2800::a130]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EBEF32FB for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 10:54:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@omnilan.de) Received: from mh0.gentlemail.de (ezra.dcm1.omnilan.net [IPv6:2a00:e10:2800::a135]) by mx0.gentlemail.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v56AsVjk062955; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 12:54:31 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@omnilan.de) Received: from titan.inop.mo1.omnilan.net (s1.omnilan.de [217.91.127.234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mh0.gentlemail.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2F0C88C8; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 12:54:31 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <593689DA.8000304@omnilan.de> Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 12:54:18 +0200 From: Harry Schmalzbauer Organization: OmniLAN User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; de-DE; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100906 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vincenzo Maffione CC: freebsd-net Subject: Re: ovs-netmap forgotten? References: <5926FFDB.7040900@omnilan.de> <592F20A0.4020702@omnilan.de> <592FC60A.1030308@omnilan.de> <5935A20A.6040000@omnilan.de> <59367CF5.9080101@omnilan.de> In-Reply-To: <59367CF5.9080101@omnilan.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (mx0.gentlemail.de [IPv6:2a00:e10:2800::a130]); Tue, 06 Jun 2017 12:54:31 +0200 (CEST) X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: mx0.gentlemail.de; Sender-ip: ; Sender-helo: mh0.gentlemail.de; ) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 10:54:33 -0000 Bezüglich Harry Schmalzbauer's Nachricht vom 06.06.2017 11:59 (localtime): … > Having other offloadings enabled or disabled (regardless if it's on > parent or vlan-clone) doesn't matter, … I must correct myself! At least when it comes to host-stack traffic. Keeping offloadings enabled on the vale-attached interface doesn't interfere with vale(4) traffic, but with host traffic. Since I don't know anything about the implementation of offloadings, I assumed it would affect vale packets, but the real effect is the opposite of what I expected, so the statment above is simply wrong, sorry. -harry