From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 8 13:58:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78FEC1065676 for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2010 13:58:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john@dexter.starfire.mn.org) Received: from dexter.starfire.mn.org (starfire.skypoint.net [173.8.102.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 213428FC1B for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2010 13:58:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from john@localhost) by dexter.starfire.mn.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) id o18Dwta21038 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 8 Feb 2010 07:58:55 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from john) Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 07:58:55 -0600 From: John To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100208075855.A20993@starfire.mn.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Subject: Can loader.conf give you NATD support? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 13:58:56 -0000 The natd man page says it is still necessary to create a customer kernl with options IPFIREWALL options IPDIVERT Is that still true, or can it be accomplished vi a loader.conf? Thanks! -- John Lind john@starfire.MN.ORG