From owner-freebsd-smp Sun Mar 22 00:34:32 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA00106 for freebsd-smp-outgoing; Sun, 22 Mar 1998 00:34:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [195.8.129.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA29921; Sun, 22 Mar 1998 00:33:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA21674; Sun, 22 Mar 1998 09:33:28 +0100 (CET) To: sos@FreeBSD.ORG cc: peter@netplex.com.au (Peter Wemm), smp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: is it just me, or... In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 21 Mar 1998 23:55:12 +0100." <199803212255.XAA26219@sos.freebsd.dk> Date: Sun, 22 Mar 1998 09:33:27 +0100 Message-ID: <21672.890555607@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message <199803212255.XAA26219@sos.freebsd.dk>, Søren Schmidt writes: >In reply to Peter Wemm who wrote: >> It is just me or has the smp kernel taken a nose dive over the last month >> or so? > >I havn't had any problems until the latest breakage John provided :) > >I run SMP on a TYAN s1662d with 128M and two Maxtor EIDE disks, no SCSI, >so thats at least one difference. >The system behaves very nicely, even under very heavy load, interactive >response (here under X) is still exelent, no long delays or anything... I see the same thing with two rc564 processes running... -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." "Drink MONO-tonic, it goes down but it will NEVER come back up!" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message