Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 21 Feb 1999 01:19:20 -0800
From:      "Jan B. Koum " <jkb@best.com>
To:        sthaug@nethelp.no
Cc:        hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, FreeBSD-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: New breakin technique?
Message-ID:  <19990221011920.A3370@best.com>
In-Reply-To: <21711.919587922@verdi.nethelp.no>; from sthaug@nethelp.no on Sun, Feb 21, 1999 at 10:05:22AM %2B0100
References:  <19990221005615.A559@best.com> <21711.919587922@verdi.nethelp.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Feb 21, 1999 at 10:05:22AM +0100, sthaug@nethelp.no wrote:
> > > So why are rpc.statd and portmap started by default in FreeBSD?
> > 
> > 	AFAIK only portmap is started. Not rpc.statd - but I do
> > 	agree with you that portmap should not be started by
> > 	default. Jordan - your call?
> 
> $Id: rc.conf,v 1.83 1999/02/09 04:17:45 dillon Exp $
> ...
> rpc_statd_enable="YES"	# Run NFS rpc.statd if nfs_server (or NO).

	Since NFR is not on by default rpc.statd is not on by default
	either.
	Plus I tend to stay way from NFS when I need security :)

-- Yan


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990221011920.A3370>