From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Sep 11 22:26:58 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from aspenworks.com (aspenworks.com [192.94.236.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E5AE37B422 for ; Mon, 11 Sep 2000 22:26:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aspenworks.com (hh1127215.direcpc.com [206.71.127.215]) by aspenworks.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e8C5Qj102087; Mon, 11 Sep 2000 23:26:46 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <39BDBDD6.81FB515C@aspenworks.com> Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2000 23:23:34 -0600 From: Alex Reply-To: alex@aspenworks.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marius Strom Cc: Bill Fumerola , "Scot W. Hetzel" , ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: mod_php4 + ssl + flash References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org It is needed, I agree.. I've spent several hours on a build of Apache. Anyone get the feeling a new ApachePro product is around the corner? I do.. I smell a 'Pro' sendmail like configurator coming.. I applaud any work that's done to make it more pleasant, and possible for more people to build and use the sophisticated features of Apache. -AH Marius Strom wrote: > > I've gotta agree here; the menu'd system for apache was wonderful and was > in ports a few {weeks,months} ago. I was greatly disappointed when I > rebuilt apache a while back to see it gone. > > -- > Marius Strom > Professional Geek/Unix System Administrator > Alpha1 Internet > http://www.marius.org/marius.pgp 0x55DE53E4 > > Turn off the faucet? We're too busy mopping up the floor! > > On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Bill Fumerola wrote: > > > > > [ redirect from -isp --> -ports ] > > > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 12:00:18AM -0500, Scot W. Hetzel wrote: > > > > > I had created such a port for the FreeBSD Apache Modualarization Project: > > > > > > http://www.westbend.net/~hetzels/mod_apache13-1.tgz > > > > > > Unfortunately, it (apache13-base) won't be imported into the FreeBSD Ports Collection, as I received a few comments that it isn't > > > needed. > > > > The apache situation is out of hand. We have far too many different theories of > > what is the right way, and none of them agree. > > > > Scot's work has worked perfectly for me when I tried it on scratch machines, why > > aren't we importing it and ditching the existing scheme? > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message