From owner-freebsd-ports Fri May 7 1:32:41 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from stampede.cs.berkeley.edu (stampede.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.45.124]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 902D415C8B; Fri, 7 May 1999 01:32:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asami@cs.berkeley.edu) Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (sji-ca3-251.ix.netcom.com [209.109.233.251]) by stampede.cs.berkeley.edu (8.8.7/8.7.3) with ESMTP id BAA29267; Fri, 7 May 1999 01:33:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.9.2/8.6.9) id BAA98873; Fri, 7 May 1999 01:31:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 7 May 1999 01:31:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199905070831.BAA98873@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> X-Authentication-Warning: silvia.hip.berkeley.edu: asami set sender to asami@cs.berkeley.edu using -f To: cpiazza@home.net Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG, foxfair@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: (message from Chris Piazza on Thu, 06 May 1999 20:56:24 -0700 (PDT)) Subject: Re: aterm/zh-aterm checksum From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) References: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * From: Chris Piazza * Hmm, I did this maybe a week ago, and it was committed by Steve (PR 11393) It * appears that when zh-aterm was committed over top of the x11/aterm it got * removed. I checked it and diff -ruN showed absolutely no differences. * MD5 (aterm-0.3.4.tar.gz) = 555ca711affe9e06010701230d5a6759 * +MD5 (aterm-0.3.4.tar.gz) = a481a97822bcc1a1dfe04b8867b7653e Thanks, committed to both. -PW To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message