From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 27 12:10:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2150A1065670 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:10:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBB2A8FC13 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:10:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n9RCA7tw088983 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:10:07 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n9RCA7GV088973; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:10:07 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:10:07 GMT Message-Id: <200910271210.n9RCA7GV088973@freefall.freebsd.org> To: ruby@FreeBSD.org From: Stanislav Sedov Cc: Subject: Re: ports/135201: ports-mgmt/portupgrade: doesn't upgrade lang/tcc X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Stanislav Sedov List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:10:08 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/135201; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Stanislav Sedov To: Hiroto Kagotani Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/135201: ports-mgmt/portupgrade: doesn't upgrade lang/tcc Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:08:09 +0300 --Signature=_Tue__27_Oct_2009_15_08_09_+0300_jCoCbnt.j2E78f_7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Hiroto! There's hardly anything that portupgrade can do in that case, because MOVED support was meant to protect the user from incorrect upgrades in case when the port was removed, but stale files are still present in the tree. The reason you've observed such a problem is due to the fact that lang/tcc entry was not removed from MOVED file when the port was restored. This is fixed now. Thanks for reporting! --=20 Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE --Signature=_Tue__27_Oct_2009_15_08_09_+0300_jCoCbnt.j2E78f_7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJK5uKtAAoJEKN82nOYvCd0opoQAIbCqRe8MxnuEhg3SYfj1Xzq V0YQ3kPymqbJvupAYtT3Mzri9Yx+xY6mAqUmfwezGSsZj02+Dih2xGPRVhY+Av3m 28FVLmz97Ctpcctcg9BIZTW+oN7bQfk829oFyoMOmr0HxEPLqLrfmRNjS7NOCNjY ztzlpcGRD0Wc7xXEoIfergdwj3GvRiuGuStC24ZTNvFiVCcCzrPP2RxHVXA8RC5k ycGYBSLikKbVgSA5jKw2S7eDr6Sdfx9HptTarj5OTOU82+zpZJOTzEXCTmavY3j6 LlGcoKzGEc/sJu9fC2zYpqfiZXGhOq/ixnV89dF9u+CEivQCxN3USdnJcPyYo8bm kCAL/gm4nQjKU5j2p75wU+Omna14IluC6WGVmWscMYqwDTnsZcePelMqCbk1gkEE NjKb3RiMwJLJHZ1wpwbS8cjJ22upMx9b9GQuLIFEUekKJXXZeJqiziPULd0yWxVC EVHh9Zp5Je52/Y+axJuJaufTePRhLEAgF8zEF/YmkcignugBBFnO7FfCPyu3U6cN r/CliwA5hor7ZtkMSofze6aceYP5LHCajvnA3zM3JHxvhlcuf3L81b0ZSQsRefWg mMnGQd7fuacgPvTbPUAcPGIYN9+XfiIkVMAvnjHLku9Thv9StxFqZhDR2gyKFyMs PaSATPI3ISkiQL3zDT7t =7uma -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Tue__27_Oct_2009_15_08_09_+0300_jCoCbnt.j2E78f_7--