From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 28 16:39:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AF56106566C for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 16:39:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.lists@fsck.ch) Received: from backup.socket.ch (secure.socket.ch [91.199.228.84]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65BD98FC0A for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 16:39:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from adsl-84-226-148-116.adslplus.ch ([84.226.148.116] helo=spore.fsck.ch) by backup.socket.ch with esmtpsa (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Nvuqp-0006wE-Qy for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 17:56:37 +0200 Message-ID: <4BAF7C32.8020905@fsck.ch> Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 17:56:34 +0200 From: Tobias Roth User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20100328163828.1f34e0e7@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <20100328163828.1f34e0e7@it.buh.tecnik93.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "backup.socket.ch", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see The administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 3/28/10 3:38 PM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > Hi, > > > As announced before, a few big commits, that touch some thousands ports > are being done: png, curl, x11, gnome, kde4. The target ETA is 6-7 > April. > > The first one was done, update of graphics/png (including a shared lib > version bump), with about 5000 ports affected. > > We do _NOT_ recommend updating ports until this commits are all done, > and the problems are fixed, except if you want to help testing / fixing. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 84.226.148.116 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: freebsd.lists@fsck.ch X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on backup.socket.ch); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 16:39:31 -0000 On 3/28/10 3:38 PM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > Hi, > > > As announced before, a few big commits, that touch some thousands ports > are being done: png, curl, x11, gnome, kde4. The target ETA is 6-7 > April. > > The first one was done, update of graphics/png (including a shared lib > version bump), with about 5000 ports affected. > > We do _NOT_ recommend updating ports until this commits are all done, > and the problems are fixed, except if you want to help testing / fixing. What does that mean, the first one was done? The port was updated before this warning? I have updated png this morning, will I now be negatively affected? Thanks, Tobias