From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Feb 10 21:20:18 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id VAA26322 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 10 Feb 1995 21:20:18 -0800
Received: from ref.tfs.com (ref.tfs.com [140.145.254.251]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id VAA26314 for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 1995 21:20:16 -0800
Received: (from phk@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id VAA01997 for hackers@freebsd.org; Fri, 10 Feb 1995 21:20:07 -0800
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@ref.tfs.com>
Message-Id: <199502110520.VAA01997@ref.tfs.com>
Subject: "development dist" good idea ?
To: hackers@FreeBSD.org
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 1995 21:20:07 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 646       
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

We have talked about a "development distribution" to reduce the size of
the bindist.

Is this considered a good idea ?

Here is what I guess would go into it:
(send me email if you think this list should be changed)

	/usr/lib/*.[ao]
	/usr/include
	/usr/libexec/cc*
	/usr/bin/{cc,cpp,size,nm,as,gcc.g++,f77,gdb,f2c,gprof,gcore,make
		rpcgen,strip,tsort,lorder,cruchgen,crunchide}

This will move approx 9Mb (installed size) into the devdist...

Should uucp (~ 1MB) be put on a uucpdist ?

Any other ?

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@login.dknet.dk>
TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
FreeBSD has, until now, not one single time had an undetected error. :-)