From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Jan 14 15:23:43 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id PAA14986 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 14 Jan 1997 15:23:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from pdx1.world.net (pdx1.world.net [192.243.32.18]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id PAA14978 for ; Tue, 14 Jan 1997 15:23:39 -0800 (PST) From: proff@suburbia.net Received: from suburbia.net (suburbia.net [203.4.184.1]) by pdx1.world.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA04933 for ; Tue, 14 Jan 1997 15:24:24 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 3359 invoked by uid 110); 14 Jan 1997 23:23:03 -0000 Message-ID: <19970114232303.3358.qmail@suburbia.net> Subject: Re: ipv6? In-Reply-To: <199701141850.LAA01496@zeus.theos.com> from Theo de Raadt at "Jan 14, 97 11:50:17 am" To: deraadt@theos.com (Theo de Raadt) Date: Wed, 15 Jan 1997 10:23:03 +1100 (EST) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL28 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > I've used NRL ipv6 w/ 1.2 and except for a few (3 I think) conflicts, > > which I simple did by hand. > > NetBSD? Oh boy. Very different. > > > sort of situation. In two days I'm getting a new PC on which I plan to > > put 2.0 and NRL's ipv6, since the inet stuff hasn't been hacked a lot > > (That I can see) in 2.0 I doubt that either you or I will have any > > problems. > > Our netinet has numerous changes for added security. This must be done much > more carefully. > inria has just released (jan 3) a new copy of their netbsd/freebsd ipv6 code suite. Be warned though, it's >5Mb gziped. -Julian